Prog­nos­ti­cat­ing US de­feat and Tal­iban takeover of Afghanistan

 -  -  229


Be­ing the geostrate­gic link to East Asia, Cen­tral Asia and South Asia, events in Afghanistan usu­ally have ram­i­fi­ca­tions that go much be­yond its po­lit­i­cal bound­aries. Afghanistan has of­ten been the site of su­per­power ri­valry as con­trol over Afghanistan pro­vides ac­cess to West Asia, Cen­tral Asia and South Asia. The cur­rent sta­tus of Afghanistan, with the Tal­iban takeover, will have se­ri­ous ram­i­fi­ca­tions in South Asia, West Asia and Cen­tral Asia, ar­gues po­lit­i­cal an­a­lyst Ku­mar San­jay Singh.

RETAIN­ING HOLD OVER AFGHANISTAN OF­TEN PROVES MORE DIF­FI­CULT  than in­vad­ing it. It has proven to be the grave­yard of em­pires. In re­cent his­tory, two for­mi­da­ble su­per­pow­ers had to with­draw in dis­grace -first the USSR and now the USA. The US failed to se­cure a pup­pet and sta­ble regime in Afghanistan. Its de­par­ture brought a twenty years-long ef­fort, that ex­acted a se­ri­ous price in lives and re­sources, to nought.

Its hasty de­par­ture ex­posed the fragility of the US ex­per­i­ment of po­lit­i­cal en­gi­neer­ing in Afghanistan. Tal­iban is once again at the helm of Afghanistan pol­i­tics. How­ever, the dra­matic pic­tures of the Tal­iban takeover should not mis­lead us to equate Tal­iban I and II.

Tal­iban 2 is bet­ter equipped than Tal­iban 1. Mil­i­tar­ily it now con­trols a vast trove of so­phis­ti­cated US weaponry. For in­stance, they have a large num­ber of so­phis­ti­cated black hawk he­li­copters, even more than some strate­gic US al­lies such as Aus­tralia.

The two most pow­er­ful na­tions of the world -the USA and China are tac­itly back­ing the Tal­iban takeover.

The two most pow­er­ful na­tions of the world -the USA and China are tac­itly back­ing the Tal­iban takeover. This un­der­stand­ing be­gan when Trump opened ne­go­ti­a­tions with the Tal­iban to fa­cil­i­tate US with­drawal from Afghanistan. With Joe Biden’s de­ci­sion to with­draw, the pos­si­bil­ity of Tal­iban takeover be­came a re­al­ity.

China wishes to use the exit of the US to ex­pand its in­flu­ence in Afghanistan to achieve two strate­gic tar­gets. First, to ex­tend the belt and road ini­tia­tive in Afghanistan that will pro­vide, for China, a land route to West Asia. Sec­ond, China seeks to es­tab­lish a sta­ble regime, with whom it can do busi­ness. To en­sure the sta­bil­ity or the post-US po­lit­i­cal regime and to stake the sit­u­a­tion fur­ther in its favour, China is op­er­at­ing through a troika of Rus­sia, Pak­is­tan and Iran. Turkey may also soon be­come a part of this group.

The as­cen­dency of the Tal­iban will ad­versely im­pact three na­tions.

The United States of Amer­ica aban­doned the Kurds in Syria and Iraq. Afghanistan is the rep­e­ti­tion of this trait.

The United States of Amer­ica, be­cause it is now viewed as a fickle ally that sac­ri­fices its friends to fur­ther its short-term gains. They aban­doned the Kurds in Syria and Iraq. Afghanistan is the rep­e­ti­tion of this trait. The long term fall­out of this would be the ero­sion of US pres­ence in West Asia that will ben­e­fit Rus­sia, China and Iran.

In­dia has suf­fered a se­ri­ous set­back in its diplo­matic strat­egy in Afghanistan and West Asia. With the Tal­iban takeover, its strat­egy to prop an anti-Pak­istan regime in Afghanistan is ru­ined. Its in­vest­ments in Chab­har port is re­duced to noth­ing. And fi­nally, its at­tempt to use the Saudi-led Arab league to con­sol­i­date its pres­ence in West Asia is now at cross­roads. In­dian pol­icy to­wards Saudi was a mim­icry of the US pol­icy and will not with­stand the de­cline of the US power in West Asia. Saudi Ara­bia and UAE have al­ready opened back-chan­nel diplo­macy with Iran.

The Tal­iban takeover in Afghanistan will have detri­men­tal con­se­quences for In­dian se­cu­rity op­er­a­tions in Kash­mir.

Fur­ther, the Tal­iban takeover in Afghanistan will have detri­men­tal con­se­quences for In­dian se­cu­rity op­er­a­tions in Kash­mir.

The Tal­iban takeover will erode the rights regime in Afghanistan and will wit­ness overt and covert mea­sures to erode the rights of re­li­gious and eth­nic mi­nori­ties and also of women and chil­dren.

All of this should alert us to the per­ni­cious con­se­quences of regimes that es­pouse a ma­jori­tar­ian fas­cist ide­ol­ogy.

229 rec­om­mended
1882 views

Write a com­ment...

Your email ad­dress will not be pub­lished. Re­quired fields are marked *